Technology Editor & Reporter
![Getty images two large transparent indoor domes in front of the read logo "Some l'Action sur l'ia"](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/d286/live/a8cb72c0-e883-11ef-acf4-d3a321e6d53f.jpg.webp)
The UK and the US have not signed the International Agreement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the global summit in Paris.
The statements signed between other countries by France, China and India pledge a “open”, “comprehensive” and “ethical” approach to technology development.
Downing Street said the UK “didn’t agree to all parts of its leader’s declaration,” and “sign up only for initiatives in the UK’s national interests” but spells out which parts of the UK’s communicature. He said he was not there. I opposed it.
Previously, US Vice President JD Vance told a Paris representative that too many AI regulations could “kill transformative industries while taking off.”
Vance told world leaders that AI is an opportunity for the Trump administration to not waste it, and that “pro-AI policies” should be prioritized over safety.
He said this requires regulations that promote AI development “rather than strangle it.”
Vance added that European leaders should “see, in particular, optimistically, this new frontier, not fear.”
His comments appear to be at odds with French President Emmanuel Macron, who defended the need for further regulation.
“We need these rules to help AI move forward,” Macron said at the summit.
The UK was previously the champion of AI safety ideas, and then Prime Minister Rishi Snack held the world’s first AI safety summit in November 2023.
Andrew Dudfield, the AI director for full facts for the fact checking organization, said the government’s decision not to sign the Paris communicat would put it at risk.
“By refusing to sign today’s international AI action statement, the UK government risks undermining its struggling credibility as a global leader in safe, ethical and reliable AI innovation. I will,” he said.
![Bloomberg/Getty Images US Vice President JD Vance showed him speaking at the AI Action Summit wearing a Navy suit and a red tie.](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/786c/live/141d4b20-e870-11ef-ac6b-8d9a2f70d287.jpg.webp)
What do you say about the agreement?
The statement signed by 60 countries is ambition to reduce digital division by promoting AI accessibility and ensuring technology development is “transparent”, “safe” and “safe and reliable.” is set to:
“Making AI sustainable for people and planets” is listed as a top priority.
The deal also states that AI energy use (which could rise to as many experts as small countries in the coming years) was first discussed at the summit.
“When you look at the summit declaration, it’s difficult to pinpoint exactly what the government opposes,” said Michael Biltwissle, associate director of the ADA Lovelace Institute.
In response to the UK’s decision not to sign the letter, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman told reporters “These discussions are pretty alive,” and the UK has “worked closely with the French people throughout this process.” Ta.
“They are one of our closest partners in all areas of AI,” they said.
A balanced act
During the discussions at the summit, there will be discussions on the impact of AI development on society, the environment and governance.
Policymakers, executives and diplomats have been pondering how to capture the economic benefits of AI innovation while addressing the risks of technology.
Macron was kicked off by posting edits of his own Jokey Deep Fark clips in popular movies and TV series on social media.
“The summit is focused on action, and that’s exactly what we need right now,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Tuesday.
She said that the European approach to AI, which has been defended throughout the summit, also highlights innovation, collaboration and technology that “enves open source power.”
The conference will also be held at a time when trade tensions between the US and Europe will rise.
President Tump has decided to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, a move affecting the UK and the EU.
It is understood that the UK will not retaliate anytime soon as it aims to follow the sensitive path of establishing close ties with the EU while maintaining good relations with the Trump administration.