BBCFor Christmas, I received an interesting gift from a friend -My own “bestseller” book.
In the “Technical Split for Dummy” (a great title), my name and photo are on the cover.
But it was completely written by AI, and there were some simple prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.
It’s an interesting reading, and it’s very interesting. However, it is a lot of meandering, between self -help books and anecdotes.
It imitates my chatting style, but it’s a bit repeated and very redundant. Perhaps it was beyond Janet’s prompt when collecting data about me.
Some sentences may have been cut from “as a major technology journalist …” -Cringe -online bioso.
There is also a mysterious and repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (no pets). And almost all pages have a compared pHOR. Random than other pages.
There are dozens of online that provide AI-Book lighting services. My book was from BOOKBYANYONE.
When he contacted Adir Mashiach, a highest executive officer based in Israel, he edited a travel guide generated by AI in June 2024, and has been mainly pivoted in the United States. I told me that I sold the book I did.
The copy of your own 240 pages of a long best -selling paperback is £ 26. The company generates them using their own AI tools, based on a major open source language model.
I don’t ask you to buy my book. In fact, only the Janet that created it allows you to order more copies.
Currently, there is no barrier for those who are creating any name, including celebrities, but Massiach says there is an abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclosure item that is created by AI and indicates that it is a fictional one designed only to bring humor and joy.
Legally, copyright belongs to the company, but MASHIACH emphasizes that the product is intended as a “personalized gags” and that the book has not been sold anymore.
He wants to expand the range, generate a variety of genres such as science fiction, and probably provide autobiography. It is designed to be a light form of consumer AI, which sells products produced in AI to human customers.
It’s a bit scary if you write to make a living like me. In particular, it takes less than a minute to generate, and in some parts it sounds like me.
Getty ImageMusicers, writers, artists, and actors around the world have expressed alarms for works used to train generated AI tools and are used to stir similar content.
“When we talk about data here, it means that the life of a human creator actually works,” he said, a considerable training for AI companies to campaigns to respect creators’ rights. Says Ed Newton Rex.
“This is a book, this is an article, this is a photo. It’s a work work. It’s a record … AI training is a way to do something, and then looks like that. That is.
In 2023, the song featured in the Canadian singer Drake and Weekund’s AI was not their job, but did not agree with it, so it was reviewed by social media before being withdrawn from the streaming platform. Ta. The truck creator did not stop trying to win the Grammy Award. And the artist was fake, but it was still very popular.
“I don’t think it should be prohibited to use the generated AI for creative purposes, but the AI for these purposes, which is trained in people’s work without permission, is prohibited. I think it should be Newton Lex. “AI is very powerful, but let’s build ethically and fairly.”
In the UK, some organizations, including the BBC, have chose to block AI developers to troll online content for training purposes. Others have decided to cooperate -The Financial Times, for example, partner with Chatgpt Creator Openai.
The British government is considering overhauling laws that allow AI developers to support model development, unless the right holder opt -out.
Ed Newton Rex describes this as “crazy”.
He pointed out that AI can progress in fields such as defense, healthcare, and logistics without causing the work of the author, journalist, and artist.
“All of these will change the copyright law and change it without ruining the country’s creative livelihood,” he claims.
Baroness Kidron, a lower house cross -bench, is also strongly opposed to deleting AI’s copyright law.
“Creative Industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million employment, and many joys,” says Barones, an advisor to the AI Institute of AI at the University of Oxford.
“The government has impaired one of the best performance industries with an ambiguous promise of growth.”
The government spokeswoman states: “There is no movement until we are convinced that we have a practical plan to provide each purpose. Increasing control of the right owner to support content license, high quality materials. Increase the transparency of the UK models and the appropriate owner of AI developers to support access to the main AI. “
Under the new AI plan of the British government, AI researchers will also use national data libraries, including public data from a wide range of sources.
In the United States, the future of the Federal Rules for Managing AI is currently in the air after President Trump returns to the presidential position.
In 2023, Biden signed a presidential order, especially for sector companies, to request that the system of system mechanisms with the US government requested the details of the system’s mechanism with the US government.
But this has now been abolished by Trump. He doesn’t know what Trump will do instead, but he is said to have a less AI sector facing less regulations.
This is continued in the United States as many litigation for AI companies, especially Openai. They were taken to everyone, from the New York Times to the writer, music labels, and even comedians.
They argue that AI companies have broken the law when they obtained content from the Internet without agreement and used them to train their systems.
AI companies argue that their actions are “fair use” and thus they are exempted. There are many factors that can configure fair use. This is not a simple definition. However, the AI sector is increasingly monitoring how to collect training data and whether to pay.
If this was not enough to be ponder, the Chinese AI company Deepseek shaked this sector over the past week. It is the most downloaded free app in Apple’s US app store.
Deepseek claims that it has developed that technology for some prices like Openai. Its success causes security concerns in the United States and threatens the dominance of the current sector in the United States.
Regarding my career as an author, at the moment, if you really want a “bestseller”, you need to write it yourself. If anything, the technical split of dummy emphasizes the current weakness of a larger project AI tool. It is full of inaccuracy and hallucinations, and it can be very difficult to read the part because it is a long wave.
However, considering how fast the high -tech is evolving, it is not possible to be convinced that human writing and editing skills are quite slow.
