The Supreme Court rejects NVIDIA’s securities fraud.

Opinion analysis

The court is NVIDIA CORPV. E.OHMAN J: I heard about the discussion on Fonder AB on November 13 (Amy Lutz via Shutterstock)

Wednesday judge has rejected a dispute on the securities fraud case proposed to graphics chip manufacturers NVIDIA. Shareholders argued that NVIDIA, not a game company, has not disclosed the scope of the cryptographic minor at risk. The court is NVIDIA CORPV. E.OHMAN J: I heard Fonder AB last month, but the dismissal was not surprising. The most dominant theme of the debate was a repetition of justice that the dispute was so concrete to justify their precautions.

The specific question of this case was whether the complaint in this case was enough to file a fraud claim under a highly sued standard for securities fraud litigation based on the Personal Securities Law Reform Law. Currently, the incident returns to the court and allows investors to prove their lawsuit against NVIDIA. This was a big defeat for NVIDIA, and of course, after agreeing to hear the case, there was a legitimate reason for the judge to reverse the decision of the lower court.